Sccm collection membership not updating

17-Apr-2020 11:29

The statement above is correct for standalone mailbox servers, which is expected.However for an Exchange 2010 Database Availability Group the upgrade process can be performed with no downtime following the normal process of moving active databases off DAG members while they are being updated.When the installation has all completed successfully click the Finish button.Each of my test lab servers took between 20 and 30 minutes to upgrade, but your performance will no doubt vary.The upgrades steps are very straightforward and easy to follow. When the splash dialog appears click Install Microsoft Exchange Server upgrade. Warnings will not prevent you from proceeding, but you should pay attention to them anyway as they are often important.You'll need to click through the usual introduction and license agreement. Remember, if you're upgrading CAS Array or DAG members refer to the guidance above. The actual installation time will vary depending on the server roles installed, and whether you're upgrading from a very recent or much older Service Pack level of Exchange.You can use the standard process as demonstrated here: However, be aware that once a database has been made active on an Exchange 2010 SP3 member of the DAG, it can't be made active on a pre-SP3 DAG member again.

sccm collection membership not updating-57

Client Access servers are the first server role to update, and you should begin with the internet-facing site if you have multiple sites in your organization.I admit I was concerned when I read the release notes for Exchange 2010 SP3 that state: The database schema has been updated in Exchange 2010 SP3.As a result, when Mailbox servers are upgraded to Exchange 2010 SP3, the databases are upgraded to the Exchange 2010 SP3 version of the database schema…For Client Access servers that are in a CAS Array you should remove some of the servers (eg half of them) from the load balancer configuration, upgrade them, re-add them to the load balancer, then repeat the process with the remaining Client Access servers in that load balanced array.For an example of how to do this with Windows NLB see the following article: For other load balancers refer to your vendor documentation for how to take servers out of the load balanced array for maintenance and updates.

Client Access servers are the first server role to update, and you should begin with the internet-facing site if you have multiple sites in your organization.I admit I was concerned when I read the release notes for Exchange 2010 SP3 that state: The database schema has been updated in Exchange 2010 SP3.As a result, when Mailbox servers are upgraded to Exchange 2010 SP3, the databases are upgraded to the Exchange 2010 SP3 version of the database schema…For Client Access servers that are in a CAS Array you should remove some of the servers (eg half of them) from the load balancer configuration, upgrade them, re-add them to the load balancer, then repeat the process with the remaining Client Access servers in that load balanced array.For an example of how to do this with Windows NLB see the following article: For other load balancers refer to your vendor documentation for how to take servers out of the load balanced array for maintenance and updates.This is a significant release that delivers some key functionality to customers such as support for Windows Server 2012, support for co-existence with Exchange Server 2013 CU1, and general bug fixes and security updates.